Handwriting and Executive Functioning: Understanding Cognitive, Motor, and Sensory Influences

Handwriting is far more than neat penmanship—it’s a complex skill that depends on cognitive, motor, and sensory systems working in harmony. From executive functioning and visual perception to core strength and sensory processing, each component plays a vital role in how children learn to communicate through writing.

As occupational therapists, we see firsthand how handwriting challenges can affect participation, confidence, and academic performance. By understanding how these systems connect, you can design more effective, evidence-based interventions that not only improve writing mechanics but also help your students succeed across learning environments.

In this article, we’ll explore how cognitive, motor, and sensory foundations interact—and how you can integrate them into practice to improve handwriting outcomes for the children you work with.

Cognitive and emotional foundations of handwriting

Before a child ever picks up a pencil, the brain is already hard at work. Handwriting requires executive functioning (EF)—the higher-order cognitive skills that help children plan, organize, initiate, and complete tasks. Every time a child writes a sentence, they must hold information in working memory, generate ideas, manage attention, and self-monitor for errors. It’s no wonder handwriting can feel overwhelming for students who struggle with EF challenges.

Research confirms that handwriting is tied to literacy and academic success:

• Handwriting impairment creates barriers to fluent composition and active classroom engagement.¹

• The physical act of writing reinforces the visual and auditory aspects of language, strengthening reading and spelling.²

• Students with stronger early handwriting skills produce more advanced writing as they progress in school.³

But handwriting isn’t only cognitive—it’s also deeply emotional. When writing feels hard, children may become frustrated, anxious, or even avoid the task altogether. In one study, children who felt calm and relaxed wrote more fluently than their anxious peers.⁴ By nurturing confidence and self-regulation along with motor and cognitive skills, we can help children rediscover a sense of control and enjoyment in writing.

The motor foundation: strength, stability, and precision 

While handwriting may appear to rely on fine motor skills, it’s built upon gross motor control. Strong postural muscles and proximal stability allow the hands and fingers to move with accuracy and endurance. Without that foundation, you may notice a child working twice as hard to maintain an upright posture and steady movements.

Studies consistently link postural control and writing performance:

• Postural stability and manual dexterity are closely interrelated, highlighting how trunk control supports hand precision.⁵

• Students with stronger core muscles demonstrate faster handwriting speeds and reduced fatigue.⁶

• Among children with autism spectrum disorder, improved muscle strength has been shown to enhance executive functioning—illustrating how physical conditioning supports cognitive control.⁷

Beyond the core, fine motor precision plays a vital role in endurance and control. You can promote more fluid and sustainable writing by incorporating activities that strengthen in-hand manipulation, bilateral coordination, and grip endurance.

Yet one of the most common therapy targets—pencil grasp—may not deserve the focus it’s often given. Research shows that grasp pattern does not significantly impact handwriting legibility or speed.^8,9,10 However, inefficient grasps can still cause fatigue or discomfort during longer writing sessions. That’s why interventions should focus on letter formation, spacing, and pacing, rather than trying to “fix” how a child holds a pencil.

Visual-motor and perceptual integration

For many students, handwriting challenges originate from visual-perceptual or visual-motor integration (VMI) difficulties. These abilities allow a child to process spatial relationships, align letters on the page, and reproduce shapes accurately. When VMI is weak, writing can become messy, uneven, or painfully slow.

Early drawing and pre-writing tasks lay the groundwork for these foundational skills. Research indicates that drawing serves as a precursor to writing, enabling children to develop symbolic thinking and spatial reasoning.¹¹ Other studies have identified visual closure and in-hand manipulation as strong predictors of handwriting speed,¹² reinforcing the link between perceptual accuracy and motor execution.

Among children with developmental disabilities, consistent delays in VMI have been shown to impact both handwriting and overall academic performance.¹³ While VMI is a key predictor of success, it’s only one part of the puzzle. Handwriting fluency also depends on language, attention, and executive control—the higher-order skills that support planning, sequencing, and self-monitoring.¹⁴

In other words, visual-motor skills matter—but they’re part of a bigger picture that includes language, attention, and executive control.

Sensory foundations: regulation, reflexes, and rhythm

Handwriting fluency depends on how well a child’s sensory systems support focus, regulation, and motor control. Children with sensory modulation challenges often struggle to sustain attention, tolerate tactile feedback from the writing surface, or manage frustration during tasks. Students with handwriting difficulties often demonstrate lower sensory integration skills, including challenges in praxis, tactile discrimination, and bilateral coordination.¹⁵

One often-overlooked influence is the persistence of primitive reflexes. Retained asymmetrical and symmetrical tonic neck reflexes (ATNR and STNR) can interfere with fine motor control and postural stability, making it difficult for children to maintain an upright seated posture or write across the midline.¹⁶ 

Clinically, these students may struggle to stabilize the paper with their nondominant hand or experience fatigue quickly during extended writing. Reflex screening should therefore be a routine component of occupational therapy assessment.

Equally important are the proprioceptive, tactile, and vestibular systems, which work together to shape motor planning and endurance. Studies show that stronger proprioceptive awareness correlates with improved handwriting legibility and spacing,¹⁷ while refined tactile discrimination contributes to grip control and writing quality.¹⁸ The vestibular system supports posture and eye movement—helping children maintain steady focus when copying from the board.

When these sensory systems function in harmony, handwriting becomes smoother, more coordinated, and less effortful.

Integrating it all: evidence-based, occupation-centered practice

The evidence is clear: handwriting success relies on the seamless integration of cognitive, motor, and sensory systems. Targeting one area in isolation rarely produces lasting results. Instead, embedding handwriting practice into meaningful, occupation-based activities leads to greater improvement.

Research shows that occupation-based interventions—those that weave handwriting into purposeful tasks—produce greater gains than repetitive, handwriting-specific exercises.¹⁹ When children write as part of games, projects, or classroom participation, they naturally engage multiple systems at once: executive planning, visual-motor coordination, posture, and sensory regulation.

In practice, that might include:

• Incorporating core and shoulder-stability games (like “Superman” or “bridge”) before writing tasks.

• Using drawing or play-based activities to encourage pre-writing shapes and visual-motor control.

• Embedding handwriting into functional routines—such as labeling art projects, journaling about an experience, or writing game scores.

• Providing sensory regulation breaks to support attention and emotional readiness.

A holistic approach to handwriting success

Handwriting is far more than a motor milestone—it’s a reflection of how cognitive, emotional, and sensory systems work together to support communication and learning. When we look beyond letter formation to the underlying processes that shape it, we empower children to participate more fully in school and everyday life.

For clinicians, that means integrating executive function support, motor strengthening, and sensory regulation into every handwriting plan. For students, it means rediscovering confidence, focus, and joy in the act of writing itself.

When we approach handwriting through the lens of the whole child, we’re not just improving penmanship—we’re unlocking pathways to literacy, self-expression, and lifelong success. To explore this framework in greater depth, explore my Medbridge courses, which offer evidence-based strategies and real-world examples to help you translate these principles into meaningful outcomes for the children they serve:

• Handwriting and Executive Functioning: Understanding Cognitive, Motor, and Sensory Influences

• Handwriting and Executive Functioning: Evidence-Based Interventions and Adaptations

References

1. Grajo, L. C., Candler, C., & Sarafian, A. (2020). Interventions within the scope of occupational therapy to improve children’s academic participation: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(2), 7402180030p1–7402180030p32. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article/74/2/7402180030p1/6676/Interventions-Within-the-Scope-of-Occupational

2. Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2021). The effects of handwriting experience on literacy learning. Psychological Science, 32(7), 1086–1103. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797621993111

3. Jiménez, J. E., & Barrientos, P. (2024). Handwriting skills and their role in text generation: A longitudinal study with graphonomic measures. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.10.1.903

4. Zakraoui, J., Saleh, M., Al-Maadeed, S., & others. (2023). A study of children emotion and their performance while handwriting Arabic characters using a haptic device. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1783–1808. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11246-7

5. Flatters, I., Mushtaq, F., Hill, L. J. B., & others. (2014). The relationship between a child’s postural stability and manual dexterity. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 2907–2917. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-014-3947-4

6. Butail, R. (2024). Correlation between core muscle strength and handwriting speed among college students. Journal of Yoga and Physical Therapy, 14, 407.

7. Ludyga, S., Pühse, U., Gerber, M., & Mücke, M. (2021). Muscle strength and executive function in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 14(12), 2555–2563. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.2587

8. Schwellnus, H., Carnahan, H., Kushki, A., Polatajko, H., Missiuna, C., & Chau, T. (2012). Effect of pencil grasp on the speed and legibility of handwriting in children. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(6), 718–726. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article-abstract/66/6/718/5698/Effect-of-Pencil-Grasp-on-the-Speed-and-Legibility

9. Schwellnus, H., Carnahan, H., Kushki, A., Polatajko, H., Missiuna, C., & Chau, T. (2013). Writing forces associated with four pencil grasp patterns in Grade 4 children. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(2), 218–227. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article-abstract/67/2/218/5744/Writing-Forces-Associated-With-Four-Pencil-Grasp

10. Koziatek, S. M., & Powell, N. J. (2003). Pencil grips, legibility, and speed of fourth-graders’ writing in cursive. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(3), 284–288. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article-abstract/57/3/284/8556/Pencil-Grips-Legibility-and-Speed-of-Fourth

11. Bingham, G. E., & Gerde, H. K. (2023). Early childhood teachers’ writing beliefs and practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1236652. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236652/full

12. Brown, T., & Link, J. (2015). The association between measures of visual perception, visual-motor integration, and in-hand manipulation skills of school-age children and their manuscript handwriting speed. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(3), 163–171. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308022615600179

13. Carsone, B., Green, K., Torrence, W., & Henry, B. (2021). Systematic review of visual motor integration in children with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 2021, Article 1801196. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2021/1801196

14. Lu, H., Leung, F. K. S., & Fan, Z. (2024). A meta-analysis on the relation between handwriting and visual-motor integration. Learning and Individual Differences, 109, 102404. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608023001486?via%3Dihub

15. Donica, D. K., Beck, L., & Hill, K. (2024). Exploring the relationship between sensory integration and handwriting in elementary students. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(Supplement_2), 7811500023p1. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article-abstract/78/Supplement_2/7811500023p1/25342/Exploring-the-Relationship-Between-Sensory

16. Richards, L., Avery, R., Gray, S., & Price, R. (2022). Relationship of retained primitive reflexes and handwriting difficulty in elementary-age children. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(Supplement_1), 7610505010p1. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article/76/Supplement_1/7610505010p1/23577/Relationship-of-Retained-Primitive-Reflexes-and

17. Hong, S. Y., Jung, N.-H., & Kim, K. M. (2016). The correlation between proprioception and handwriting legibility in children. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(10), 2849–2851. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/28/10/28_jpts-2016-251/_article

18. Cox, L. E., Harris, E. C., Auld, M. L., & Johnston, L. M. (2015). Impact of tactile function on upper limb motor function in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45–46, 373–383. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891422215001201?via%3Dihub

19. Skubik-Peplaski, C., Hight, J., Bray, L., & Rushing-Carr, C. (2021). What improves handwriting: Occupation-based or handwriting interventions? The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(Supplement_2), 7512515348p1. https://research.aota.org/ajot/article-abstract/75/Supplement_2/7512515348p1/12908/What-Improves-Handwriting-Occupation-Based-or